Posts Tagged ‘retirement planning’

The best-kept tax secret for small businesses

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

By Nancy Mann Jackson, contributing writerJanuary 13, 2010: 11:42 AM ET

(CNNMoney.com) — For two years, Dr. James Smouse of Atlanta Oral and Facial Surgery tried to convince his younger partners to participate in a cash balance pension plan, a unique defined-benefit plan that offers business owners the opportunity to make hefty, tax-deferred contributions toward their retirement savings. But until the recession hit, they weren’t interested.

“They thought they’d be better off investing their money in stocks and other vehicles,” Smouse says. “But what happened over the past 18 months showed there’s a risk, and after working a few years, they’ve seen how much money they have to pay in taxes.”

With their cash balance plan — which guarantees an annual return of 4%, compounded over 30 years for the youngest participants — Smouse’s partners realized they could enjoy significant retirement benefits with tax savings now and little risk later. So in 2009, the group worked with actuaries at Jacksonville, Fla.-based Dorsa Consulting to establish their plan.

The cash balance pension plan — little-known and even less understood — is growing in popularity. “It’s the best-kept secret in retirement planning. Even CPAs don’t know about it,” says Stephen Dobrow, president of Burlingame, Calif.-based Primark Benefits.

The plans, which involve mandatory annual contributions, work best for small business owners with fewer than 20 employees and excess profits of more than $50,000 per year that they can afford to sink into funding a pension , says Richard Jensen, president of BRS Consulting in Little Rock, Ark. If your company fits the bill, you can enjoy these benefits:

Accelerated Retirement Savings. Most business owners don’t begin saving aggressively for retirement until they’re five or 10 years away from it, Dobrow says. They tend to plow any extra profits back into the business.

For those owners, a cash balance plan offers an opportunity to catch up quickly. At Smouse’s office, owners who are less than five years from retirement can sock away an extra $60,000 each year pre-tax, beyond their investments in the firm’s profit-sharing plan. Younger owners only have to put in $10,000 per year.

Security. A cash balance plan is a defined-benefit plan, as opposed to a defined contribution plan like a 401(k). That means that it guarantees a targeted annual benefit beginning when the owner reaches a certain age. Working with an actuary, participants set annual contributions that will yield the set benefit.

And upon retirement, those benefits are guaranteed: “When the market fell, people’s cash balance plans didn’t drop; their 401(k)s did,” says John McCrary of Dorsa Consulting. “People with a cash balance plan didn’t lose anything.”

Those benefits are guaranteed by the business. As the plan’s sponsor, it’s responsible for the funding. But most companies shift the responsibility to a financial services firm.

For example, say a plan wants to guarantee a post-retirement benefit of $1,000 per month for life. The plan sponsor can then go buy an annuity from a company like ING (ING).

“ING promises to pay that participant the $1,000 per month as long as they live,” McCrary says “The only investment risk that the participant now has is that ING stays in business during his lifetime. No matter what the market does, the risk now has shifted from the plan to ING. But they have a pool of money to pay from, so they really have maybe 15 to 20 years for the market to rebound and start growing again.”

McCrary compares a defined benefit plan to a loan. “We know how much we want at retirement, we know how many years we have until we reach age 65, and we can estimate a rate of return,” he says. “It’s not really quite that easy, but that is the big picture.”

However, if the investment returns are poor, the plans can be underfunded. Because most cash balance plans for small employers will terminate when the owner retires, the final contribution due is the amount needed to cover any underfunding. In that case, the owner can either contribute the full amount or waive any shortfall, which means they will take a smaller benefit, McCrary says.

But cash balance plans are conservative, aiming for slow, steady growth with a return of 5% to 6% percent, which helps limit losses in a bad market.

Extreme tax relief. A cash balance plan offers business owners a legal vehicle to defer paying taxes on large sums of income. “It’s a great way to lower your taxes,” McCrary says. “Would you rather save money for yourself or pay off all this [government] spending that’s going on?”

For most businesses, the highest expense after salaries “is tax liability,” Smouse says. “To legally not pay as much in taxes, there aren’t many avenues. [With a cash balance plan], the money you’re not giving to the federal government will be put into your own pocket when you retire. It will be taxed then, but hopefully we’ll be in a lower tax bracket then.”

More at: Money.com

Death Cometh for the Greenback

Friday, October 30th, 2009

by Joseph E. Stiglitz
10.27.2009
From the November/December issue of The National Interest.

THE DOLLAR is in trouble. That’s clear, and it’s been true for a while.

The cornerstone of the global economic system has long been the greenback. In the aftermath of the Vietnam War and the oil shocks that brought on inflation, the value of the dollar relative to other currencies could not be maintained, so countries moved away from pegging their currencies to America’s. But still, the almighty dollar was used by countries all over the world for their reserves. The reserves provided backing for the currency and the country. They were a bank account that could be drawn upon in times of need. If oil prices shot up, a crop failed or lenders demanded their money back, there was a stockpile of money that could be used.

There was a longtime confidence in the dollar, even more when then–Chairman of the Federal Reserve Paul Volcker brought down inflation in the early ’80s. The dollar was a good “store of value.” And the fact that others were willing to hold American dollars was a big advantage to the United States—it could borrow cheaply abroad.

To assure the dollar’s standing, by the ’90s, America officially had a strong-dollar policy. Speeches by then–Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin affirmed our determination to maintain the value of the dollar. And for much of the period, the dollar was indeed “strong.” But it had little to do with the speeches, though I sometimes suspect not only that the secretary of the treasury but also the financial markets thought so.

For the past eight years, the dollar has increasingly become less revered. Its value has been volatile. As the rest of the world saw the United States struggling with a failing war and soaring budget deficits, many who had large dollar holdings began to reduce those reserves (or increase them less than they otherwise would have). All this put downward pressure on the dollar. And thus began the first signs of a vicious circle. The strength of the dollar is becoming riskier and riskier. The growing U.S. deficit and the ballooning of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheets leave many worried that in their wake will come inflation, undermining the long-term attractiveness of the U.S. currency.

In this article, I try to explain why the dollar is in trouble, but ask—should we care? What are the consequences? I will suggest that, for the most part, and for most Americans, it is probably a good thing. But the adjustment to a lower value of the dollar will not necessarily come easily. One of the consequences—already under way—is the fraying of the dollar-reserve system. I argue that a move to a global reserve system would be good for the United States, and good for the world.

Read More

Watch Those Beneficiary Designations

Friday, July 17th, 2009

We all want to live a long and productive life, with our retirement account landing at zero as we take our final breath. But of course it rarely works out that way. So when was the last time you reviewed and updated the beneficiary designations of your 401(k), 403(b), or IRA?

Did you know that how you designate a beneficiary–or your failure to do so–can dramatically affect the taxes owed and whether or not the account might keep growing after you’re gone?

Over the years, you’ve been able to defer income taxes through account contributions and (hopefully) through growth of the investments. But at age 70 ½ or your death if earlier, Uncle Sam wants his pound of flesh…at least annually.

If you’re married and have named your spouse as beneficiary, there’s considerable flexibility. Your spouse can remain as beneficiary and follow the distribution rules or can treat the retirement account as his or her own.

If you’ve named a beneficiary who is not your spouse, then that person(s) will have the opportunity to stretch the annual required minimum distributions (RMDs) over their own life expectancy. Depending on the beneficiary’s tax bracket and the size of the distributions, it may result in lower overall taxes spread over many years–plus the potential for continued tax-deferred account growth.

Note that the IRS differentiates between “beneficiary” and “designated beneficiary.” An entity such as a charity or your estate can never be a designated beneficiary. Charities and estates have no life expectancy over which to stretch the required distributions. While ABC Charity can be named a “beneficiary,” you must have a pulse to be considered a “designated beneficiary” and be eligible for the stretch option.

Unless there’s a compelling reason to control account distributions from beyond the grave (spendthrift children or second marriage situations, for example), you generally will want to avoid naming a trust as beneficiary of your retirement account. There is no particular tax benefit to be gained by it and it simply creates an additional layer in the distribution process. Be sure to consult a qualified attorney if you are considering this option.

Failure to designate a beneficiary doesn’t necessarily mean that your family won’t eventually benefit from your retirement account. But it does mean the account must be distributed over a much shorter period, likely resulting in a bigger tax bite and curtailing any potential ongoing growth.

So be sure to review and update your beneficiary designations periodically–especially if you’ve had a change in marital status or previously designated beneficiaries have gone before you.

© 2009 Larry McClanahan

Larry McClanahan, MBA, CASL®, CFP® is an independent, fee-based advisor in the Portland, Oregon area, providing retirement income planning and wealth management to retirees and those approaching retirement. He can be reached at http://www.larrymcclanahan.com Advisory services and securities through KMS Financial Services, member FINRA/SIPC.

It’s important to find a financial advisor who is knowledgable in the field of estate planning to assist you in such matters.
You can find a listing of the best financial advisors in your community at www.BestofUS.com