Posts Tagged ‘Estate Tax Planning’

Simple and effective estate planning strategies

Friday, March 12th, 2010

By Jim Grant – Parksville Qualicum Beach News

Why do people do estate planning? There are lots of reasons: maximize the value; minimize the taxes; include or exclude a specific person; support a charity, etc.

There are many complex and expensive ways to achieve these and other objectives. But for most people, objectives are simple, and so should be the solutions.

My estate planning goals, for example, can be easily summarized: to be fair — so that hopefully when all is said and done, my children will still speak to each other; and to do what I can to ensure that whatever is left is put to good use, and has some lasting benefit.

When working on an estate plan recently, I came across a little-known strategy that can be executed through an insurance company.

It starts with investments available from insurance companies. This could include vehicles such as annuities, insurance policies, segregated funds, and GICs. In many ways these investment products are similar to their non-insurance counterparts: GIC rates, for example, are competitive with bank GICs, and are covered by insurance up to $100,000. Segregated funds as well, like mutual funds, come in a variety of shapes and forms. But there are some key advantages to both of these.

To begin with, there is the ability to name beneficiaries. Rather than the proceeds of these investments going through the estate, you can elect to have the funds pass directly to those who you name as your beneficiaries — without delay. Right out of the gate there is a savings that could easily exceed two per cent, when you consider the probate fees as well as the legal fees typically associated with settling an estate.

But there is more. Some insurance companies will also allow you to stipulate in their contract how the beneficiaries will receive the funds.

For example, an annuity might be an option. So rather than receiving a lump sum (that some parents fear might be squandered), the beneficiary would instead receive a monthly income for a specified period of time, or for life. The amount of income can be fixed, or can be indexed. Or, in the case of at least one company, the level of income can be tied to the performance of the stock and/or bond market.

As far as I know, the only other way to ensure such an outcome would be through a trust — a document that is complex and expensive to set up and maintain. Instead, by completing a simple form through an insurance company, your wishes could be met, and it wouldn’t cost you anything.

For more information please feel free to call or e-mail.

Jim Grant, CFP (Certified Financial Planner) is a Financial Advisor with Raymond James Ltd (RJL). This article is for information only. Securities are offered through Raymond James Ltd., member CIPF.Insurance and estate planning offered through Raymond James Financial Planning Ltd., not member CIPF. For more information feel free to call Jim at 250-594-1100, or e-mail at jim.grant@raymondjames.ca. and/or visit www.jimgrant.ca.

No Estate Tax for 365 Days

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

As of Jan. 1, there is no federal estate tax and a reduction in the number of taxable estates in the US.

Unfortunately, the clock is ticking on this federal tax hiatus, and the alarm may sound before the year is over.

In 2001, when any estate more than $675,000 was taxed, Congress passed tax cuts that gradually decreased the amount of estate tax payable by the estates of those dying over the following eight years.

These tax cuts increased the federal exemption to $3.5 million in 2009, eventually culminating in the temporary elimination of federal estate taxes for estates of those dying in 2010.

The bill passed in 2001 had a sunset provision, whereby the law ends at the end of this year.

In 2011, the estate tax comes back for estates of $1 million or greater, at a maximum rate of 55 percent, if Congress does not act before the end of this year.

In December of 2009, the House of Representatives passed a bill that would have halted this year’s temporary removal of the federal estate tax, reinstating last year’s levels for another year.

The Senate, however, didn’t yet vote on it.

The House has introduced a new bill which would make last year’s $3.5 million exemption permanent and cap the top rate at 45 percent. This new bill is waiting for the Senate’s approval.

If this bill were to be passed, it would be retroactive to Jan. 1, 2010. The one thing that never changes, however, is that a bequest to a spouse or to a charity would not be taxed.

In Lafayetta, LA contact Andrew Ahrems at:
http://www.ahrensinvptr.com/new/ahrensinvptr/